Volume 19, Issue 4
Volume 19, Issue 3
Volume 19, Issue 2
Volume 19, Issue 1
Older Volumes.....

Search:
All of MI
Housing Policy Debate

Metropolitan Institute
1021 Prince St, Suite 100
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-8100 tel
703-518-8009 fax
mivt@vt.edu


mi email
 
Sign up today and recieve email notification of new postings to the MI site.
First Name: *
Last Name:*
Company or  Affiliation:*
Email:*


* Required Field


Comment: Petersen

 

Volume 17, Issue 1
2006
 
John Petersen
 
The growing differential between tax rates for single-family dwellings and apartments is evidence of several accelerating trends. For single-family housing, the rate has declined over the past decade as the role of the property tax has diminished and other forms of revenue have become more significant. Moreover, new suburban residential developments have seen rapidly increasing use of privatization to supplant local government services and taxes. Apartments tend to be concentrated in older, more densely settled urban areas that continue to rely on the property tax, grow more slowly, and depend more on local governments for services. Fiscal zoning, reinforced by fiscal impact analysis and homeowners’ economic self-interest, has militated against building apartments in growing areas.

Given policies that favor homeownership and foster single-family housing as an investment, market forces will likely work to close the tax rate gap by restricting locally financed services to those who cannot afford to pay for them.
 
© Copyright 2009 Metropolitan Institute. All Rights Reserved. Designed by DC Web Designers