Volume 19, Issue 4
Volume 19, Issue 3
Volume 19, Issue 2
Volume 19, Issue 1
Volume 18, Issue 4
Volume 18, Issue 3
Volume 18, Issue 2
Volume 18, Issue 1
Volume 17, Issue 4
Volume 17, Issue 3
Volume 17, Issue 2
Volume 17, Issue 1
Volume 16, Issues 3 and 4
Does Mobility Matter: The Neighborhood Conditions of Housing Voucher Holders by Race and Ethnicity
Comment: Khadduri
Comment: Bratt
Comment: McClure
Participation in a Residential Mobility Program from the Clients' Perspective: Findings from Gautreaux Two
Residential Location, Transportation, and Welfare-to-Work in the United States: A Case Study of Milwaukee
The Impacts of Welfare Reform on Recipients of Housing Assistance
The Cost-Effectiveness of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Relative to Vouchers: Evidence from Six Metropolitan Areas
What Makes Community Reinvestment Act Agreements Work? A Study of Lender Responses
The Legacy of the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation
Housing Vouchers in the United States, Great Britain, and the Netherlands: Current Issues and Future Perspectives
Volume 16, Issue 2
Volume 16, Issue 1
Volume 15, Issue 4
Volume 15, Issue 3
Volume 15, Issue 2
Volume 15, Issue 1
Volume 14, Issue 4
Volume 14, Issue 3
Volume 14, Issues 1 and 2
Volume 13, Issue 4
Volume 13, Issue 3
Volume 13, Issue 2
Volume 13, Issue 1
Volume 12, Issue 4
Volume 12, Issue 3
Volume 12, Issue 2
Volume 12, Issue 1
Volume 11, Issue 4
Volume 11, Issue 3
Volume 11, Issue 2
Volume 11, Issue 1
Volume 10, Issue 4
Volume 10, Issue 3
Volume 10, Issue 2
Volume 10, Issue 1
Volume 9, Issue 4
Volume 9, Issue 3
Volume 9, Issue 2
Volume 9, Issue 1
Volume 8, Issue 4
Volume 8, Issue 3
Volume 8, Issue 2
Volume 8, Issue 1
Volume 7, Issue 4
Volume 7, Issue 3
Volume 7, Issue 2
Volume 7, Issue 1
Volume 6, Issue 4
Volume 6, Issue 3
Volume 6, Issue 2
Volume 6, Issue 1
Volume 5, Issue 4
Volume 5, Issue 3
Volume 5, Issue 2
Volume 5, Issue 1
Volume 4, Issue 4
Volume 4, Issue 3
Volume 4, issue 2
Volume 4, Issue 1
Volume 3, Issue 4
Volume 3, Issue 3
Volume 3, Issue 2
Volume 3, Issue 1
Volume 2, Issue 4
Volume 2, Issue 3
Volume 2, Issue 2
Volume 2 Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue 1

Search:
All of MI
Housing Policy Debate

Metropolitan Institute
1021 Prince St, Suite 100
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-8100 tel
703-518-8009 fax
mivt@vt.edu


mi email
 
Sign up today and recieve email notification of new postings to the MI site.
First Name: *
Last Name:*
Company or  Affiliation:*
Email:*


* Required Field


Participation in a Residential Mobility Program from the Clients' Perspective: Findings from Gautreaux Two
Volume 16, Issues 3 & 4
2005
 
Jennifer Pashup, Kathryn Edin, Greg J. Duncan and Karen Burke
 
In 2002, the Gautreaux Two housing mobility program provided low-income families living in Chicago public housing with the opportunity to move to more affluent, less racially isolated communities. This article presents findings on their complex search and moving process. Only about one-third of enrolled families actually moved through the program (“leased-up”). In-depth interviews with a randomly chosen sample of 71 families and an additional 20 “likely mover” families showed that movers fell into four groups distinguished by personal characteristics that made it easier for them to move or by residence on Chicago’s North Side.
 
Nonmovers faced a variety of obstacles, both external (a tight rental market, discrimination, and bureaucratic delays) and internal (limited experience and program comprehension, large household size, and health problems). Also, some nonmovers were too busy with work or school to engage in what proved to be an onerous process of identifying a suitable unit and moving.
 
© Copyright 2009 Metropolitan Institute. All Rights Reserved. Designed by DC Web Designers