Volume 19, Issue 4
Volume 19, Issue 3
Volume 19, Issue 2
Volume 19, Issue 1
Volume 18, Issue 4
Volume 18, Issue 3
Volume 18, Issue 2
Volume 18, Issue 1
Volume 17, Issue 4
Volume 17, Issue 3
Volume 17, Issue 2
Volume 17, Issue 1
Volume 16, Issues 3 and 4
Does Mobility Matter: The Neighborhood Conditions of Housing Voucher Holders by Race and Ethnicity
Comment: Khadduri
Comment: Bratt
Comment: McClure
Participation in a Residential Mobility Program from the Clients' Perspective: Findings from Gautreaux Two
Residential Location, Transportation, and Welfare-to-Work in the United States: A Case Study of Milwaukee
The Impacts of Welfare Reform on Recipients of Housing Assistance
The Cost-Effectiveness of the Low-Income Housing Tax Credit Relative to Vouchers: Evidence from Six Metropolitan Areas
What Makes Community Reinvestment Act Agreements Work? A Study of Lender Responses
The Legacy of the Home Owners’ Loan Corporation
Housing Vouchers in the United States, Great Britain, and the Netherlands: Current Issues and Future Perspectives
Volume 16, Issue 2
Volume 16, Issue 1
Volume 15, Issue 4
Volume 15, Issue 3
Volume 15, Issue 2
Volume 15, Issue 1
Volume 14, Issue 4
Volume 14, Issue 3
Volume 14, Issues 1 and 2
Volume 13, Issue 4
Volume 13, Issue 3
Volume 13, Issue 2
Volume 13, Issue 1
Volume 12, Issue 4
Volume 12, Issue 3
Volume 12, Issue 2
Volume 12, Issue 1
Volume 11, Issue 4
Volume 11, Issue 3
Volume 11, Issue 2
Volume 11, Issue 1
Volume 10, Issue 4
Volume 10, Issue 3
Volume 10, Issue 2
Volume 10, Issue 1
Volume 9, Issue 4
Volume 9, Issue 3
Volume 9, Issue 2
Volume 9, Issue 1
Volume 8, Issue 4
Volume 8, Issue 3
Volume 8, Issue 2
Volume 8, Issue 1
Volume 7, Issue 4
Volume 7, Issue 3
Volume 7, Issue 2
Volume 7, Issue 1
Volume 6, Issue 4
Volume 6, Issue 3
Volume 6, Issue 2
Volume 6, Issue 1
Volume 5, Issue 4
Volume 5, Issue 3
Volume 5, Issue 2
Volume 5, Issue 1
Volume 4, Issue 4
Volume 4, Issue 3
Volume 4, issue 2
Volume 4, Issue 1
Volume 3, Issue 4
Volume 3, Issue 3
Volume 3, Issue 2
Volume 3, Issue 1
Volume 2, Issue 4
Volume 2, Issue 3
Volume 2, Issue 2
Volume 2 Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue 1

Search:
All of MI
Housing Policy Debate

Metropolitan Institute
1021 Prince St, Suite 100
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-8100 tel
703-518-8009 fax
mivt@vt.edu


mi email
 
Sign up today and recieve email notification of new postings to the MI site.
First Name: *
Last Name:*
Company or  Affiliation:*
Email:*


* Required Field


Residential Location, Transportation, and Welfare-to-Work in the United States: A Case Study of Milwaukee
Volume 16, Issues 3 & 4
2005
 
Qing Shen and Thomas W. Sanchez

This article addresses two questions about spatial barriers to welfare-to-work transition in the United States. First, what residential and transportation adjustments do welfare recipients tend to make as they try to become economically self-sufficient? Second, do these adjustments actually increase the probability that they will become employed?

Analysis of 1997–2000 panel data on housing location and automobile ownership for Milwaukee welfare recipients reveals two tendencies: (1) to relocate to neighborhoods with less poverty and more racial integration and (2) to obtain a car. Results from binary logit models indicate that residential relocation and car ownership both increase the likelihood that welfare recipients will become employed. These findings suggest that policies should aim to facilitate residential mobility for low-income families and improve their neighborhoods, rather than simply move them closer to job opportunities. The findings also suggest a critical role for transportation policy in reducing unemployment.
 
© Copyright 2009 Metropolitan Institute. All Rights Reserved. Designed by DC Web Designers