Volume 19, Issue 4
Volume 19, Issue 3
Volume 19, Issue 2
Volume 19, Issue 1
Older Volumes.....

Search:
All of MI
Housing Policy Debate

Metropolitan Institute
1021 Prince St, Suite 100
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-8100 tel
703-518-8009 fax
mivt@vt.edu


mi email
 
Sign up today and recieve email notification of new postings to the MI site.
First Name: *
Last Name:*
Company or  Affiliation:*
Email:*


* Required Field


Comment: Carr, Rengert, Huh

 

Volume 15, Issue 2
2004
 
James H. Carr, Kristopher M. Rengert, and Kil Huh
 
In their discussion of the relationship between the Earned Income Tax Credit (EITC) and housing cost burdens for lower-income families, Stegman, Davis, and Quercia propose to significantly modify the EITC's benefit structure based on housing cost burdens. But leveraging the EITC to better address housing cost burdens does not require that EITC become housing policy, that itsl egislative authority be substantially rewritten, or that its  funding be increased by billions of dollars. Moreover, substantially shifting policy justification and rationale for the EITC could undermine its broad-based political popularity while further marginalizing the authority of the U.S. Department of Housing and Urban Development over lower-income housing programs.
 
A first step toward better leveraging the EITC to improve housing opportunities is to increase the program's claims rate while helping taxpayers to access lower cost tax preparation assistance. In addition, the manner in which households claim the EITC can be better managed to allow them to more effectively offset rent or mortgage payments. Finally, the EITC can serve as an important financial resource that could help many families establish banking relationships that lead to asset development and homeownership.
 
© Copyright 2009 Metropolitan Institute. All Rights Reserved. Designed by DC Web Designers