Volume 19, Issue 4
Volume 19, Issue 3
Volume 19, Issue 2
Volume 19, Issue 1
Volume 18, Issue 4
Volume 18, Issue 3
Volume 18, Issue 2
Volume 18, Issue 1
Volume 17, Issue 4
The Impact of Real Estate Market Knowledge on Tenure Choice
Comment: Courchane and Zorn
Comment: Farley
The Future of Infill Housing in California: Opportunities, Potential, and Feasibility
Child Characteristics and Successful Use of Housing Vouchers:
Federal Colonias Policy in California: Too Broad and Too Narrow
The Role of Housing and Services in Ending Family Homelessness
Volume 17, Issue 3
Volume 17, Issue 2
Volume 17, Issue 1
Volume 16, Issues 3 and 4
Volume 16, Issue 2
Volume 16, Issue 1
Volume 15, Issue 4
Volume 15, Issue 3
Volume 15, Issue 2
Volume 15, Issue 1
Volume 14, Issue 4
Volume 14, Issue 3
Volume 14, Issues 1 and 2
Volume 13, Issue 4
Volume 13, Issue 3
Volume 13, Issue 2
Volume 13, Issue 1
Volume 12, Issue 4
Volume 12, Issue 3
Volume 12, Issue 2
Volume 12, Issue 1
Volume 11, Issue 4
Volume 11, Issue 3
Volume 11, Issue 2
Volume 11, Issue 1
Volume 10, Issue 4
Volume 10, Issue 3
Volume 10, Issue 2
Volume 10, Issue 1
Volume 9, Issue 4
Volume 9, Issue 3
Volume 9, Issue 2
Volume 9, Issue 1
Volume 8, Issue 4
Volume 8, Issue 3
Volume 8, Issue 2
Volume 8, Issue 1
Volume 7, Issue 4
Volume 7, Issue 3
Volume 7, Issue 2
Volume 7, Issue 1
Volume 6, Issue 4
Volume 6, Issue 3
Volume 6, Issue 2
Volume 6, Issue 1
Volume 5, Issue 4
Volume 5, Issue 3
Volume 5, Issue 2
Volume 5, Issue 1
Volume 4, Issue 4
Volume 4, Issue 3
Volume 4, issue 2
Volume 4, Issue 1
Volume 3, Issue 4
Volume 3, Issue 3
Volume 3, Issue 2
Volume 3, Issue 1
Volume 2, Issue 4
Volume 2, Issue 3
Volume 2, Issue 2
Volume 2 Issue 1
Volume 1, Issue 1

Search:
All of MI
Housing Policy Debate

Metropolitan Institute
1021 Prince St, Suite 100
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-8100 tel
703-518-8009 fax
mivt@vt.edu


mi email
 
Sign up today and recieve email notification of new postings to the MI site.
First Name: *
Last Name:*
Company or  Affiliation:*
Email:*


* Required Field


The Role of Housing and Services in Ending Family Homelessness
Volume 17, Issue 4
2006
 
Ellen L. Bassuk and Stephanie Geller
 
This article reviews what is known about the role of housing and services
in reducing family homelessness. People in families comprise 33 percent of
the homeless population, but few resources are available to fully meet their
needs. Some researchers have suggested that the vast majority of these families
do not need services and that housing vouchers alone can end most family
homelessness.

The literature on the effects of housing subsidies and services on homeless
families is limited compared with the literature on homeless individuals.
Evidence suggests that access to housing vouchers seems to increase residential
stability and that case management and other services also contribute to residential stability and other desirable outcomes, including family preservation
and reunification. Additional research is needed to better understand the role
of housing and services in stabilizing different subgroups of families, as well as
which approaches are most cost-effective.
 
© Copyright 2009 Metropolitan Institute. All Rights Reserved. Designed by DC Web Designers