Volume 19, Issue 4
Volume 19, Issue 3
Volume 19, Issue 2
Volume 19, Issue 1
Older Volumes.....

Search:
All of MI
Housing Policy Debate

Metropolitan Institute
1021 Prince St, Suite 100
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-8100 tel
703-518-8009 fax
mivt@vt.edu


mi email
 
Sign up today and recieve email notification of new postings to the MI site.
First Name: *
Last Name:*
Company or  Affiliation:*
Email:*


* Required Field


Comment: Eggert

 

Volume 18, Issue 2
2007


Kurt Eggert

After discussing the article by Stegman et al., this comment describes the barriers to preventive servicing for securitized residential loans and assesses the importance of loan modifications, given the recent increases in default and foreclosure rates for subprime loans. Several hurdles slow or reduce such modifications, even those that help borrowers and investors alike. For example, self-interest may reduce servicers' willingness to modify loans rapidly. In addition, underlying securitization agreements may impede servicers' ability and discretion in this area. Further tax laws that govern a common securitization entity may limit modifications, as may accounting standards. Finally, "tranche warfare," the sometimes contradictory fiduciary duties servicers have toward investors holding different tranches of securitized pools, may decrease their ability or their willingness to modify loans.

This comment concludes that barriers to effective loan modifications should be reduced or eliminated where feasible, but that the securitization of subprime loans creates risks for borrowers.
© Copyright 2009 Metropolitan Institute. All Rights Reserved. Designed by DC Web Designers