Volume 19, Issue 4
Volume 19, Issue 3
Volume 19, Issue 2
Volume 19, Issue 1
Older Volumes.....

Search:
All of MI
Housing Policy Debate

Metropolitan Institute
1021 Prince St, Suite 100
Alexandria, VA 22314
703-706-8100 tel
703-518-8009 fax
mivt@vt.edu


mi email
 
Sign up today and recieve email notification of new postings to the MI site.
First Name: *
Last Name:*
Company or  Affiliation:*
Email:*


* Required Field


Two Sides of a Coin? New Urbanism and Gated Communities

 

Volume 18, Issue 3
2007

Jill L. Grant

Contemporary residential building trends reflect concerns about privacy, traffic, and managing difference. Despite the radically different premises behind New Urbanism and gated communities, I find on closer inspection that they both respond to similar perceived crises in our cities. New Urbanism answers urban challenges with bold efforts to recapture the strengths of older communities and to supplant unwanted suburban patterns with those believed to have greater resilience and public purpose.  Gated communities reveal popular skepticism about the potential for improving urban conditions and a consequent desire to retreat to protected compounds.
 
In both cases, the new suburbs generally provide housing primarily for the most affluent among us and represent the ascendance of private over public interests. By examining the Canadian urban context, this article explores some ways in which New Urbanism and gated communities differ, while also highlighting the characteristics and dilemmas they share.
© Copyright 2009 Metropolitan Institute. All Rights Reserved. Designed by DC Web Designers